Skip to main content

The Sugar vs. Bass Hack

Posted in .

Another intangible hack offered by harm reduction leaders was the idea of what one called “sugar” and “bass”. What they meant was ways to use tone, inflection, and voice to help diffuse and reinforce the impact of enforcing community agreements or boundaries.

“Sugar” would purposely soften their words, while “bass” would drop their voice to convey firmness. Both techniques are deployed depending on the situation.

There are certain things that may not seem intuitive that, nevertheless, cleanup many harm reduction organizers felt were essential to creating harm reduction spaces and services free of escalation. These included cross-training and ”Proceduralization”.

Featured Hacks

These featured hacks highlight creative, practical solutions from harm reduction leaders on the ground. From DIY tools to clever workarounds, each one reflects the ingenuity, care, and real-world experience that keeps this movement alive. 

Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Hacks

Featured in: ,
Though largely unsupported by scientific evidence, the dangers of needle stick injury loom large in the popular imagination. As a result, the emotional response to needle stick injury can be intense even if, statistically, the risks are quite low. For this reason, if no other, it’s essential that harm reduction organizations be prepared for how they might deal with such an eventuality.
Read this Hack

Consent Culture

Featured in: ,
The concept of “consent culture” emerged from the sex positive movement of the 1980s and 90s. It was a response to the concept of “rape culture”, a term that had been coined to describe the experience that many people—especially women, queer and trans people—have of sexual violence and harassment.
Read this Hack